Knowledge is Freedom

Yesterday a newer old friend who never met my wife saw a blog article and forwarded it to me. The friend was afraid I’d get angry about it or be hurt. The article began: Last month should have been the 18th birthday of my oldest daughter…

Twenty-four years ago, my very short marriage ended abruptly and against my heart’s desire and wishes. Our child would have been 23 in December or January. I wanted children for as long as I can remember. But a miscarriage ended that hope and in four more weeks my wife had left me to grieve a double loss, and without any clear explanation.

During our marriage, three separate marriage counselors encouraged her to share her feelings and issues with me and she flatly refused. All three fired us for that issue. The last one gave her the permission to leave she’d needed someone else to give. In California, no-fault divorce meant that I had no real input into the process.

I was young and my wife was eight years younger, and only four hours after the ceremony I realized we had made a devastating mistake. Neither of us was who the other thought. But my faith and my disposition made it impossible for me to admit failure so I soldiered on. An event happened that day that was shaming and demeaning to me, and that left me so broken I didn’t see how I would cope. It was not the sort of thing one might guess. I felt like I was suffocating and began to grieve the relationship and the career that would never be possible when things played out.

Against this backdrop we agreed not to have a child until we were financially better established. When finances went from bad to worse, I brought her to my parents home, because I couldn’t make her homeless. It was horrible.

Parenting Matters

In retrospect, my wife was obviously and morbidly depressed. But she refused help. Her retreat left me with the burden of decision making for the both of us, something I wasn’t able or willing to do. My wife was very young and had been abused by a mother who refused to recognize that her children were separate individuals.

My mother-in-law was a self-pitying, malignant narcissist who used her home library, 20 shelves of self-help books and medical journals, to lend her self-pity an aire of legitimacy. She began on my wife at a young age by indoctrinating her with the idea that they both were suffering whatever illness or syndrome was flavor of the month. After all they were the same person.

My wife’s Daddy issues, that had been relatively silent, opened wide and swallowed me, the first week of our marriage. This included a session where she began speaking like a three-year-old for several hours. Over the following weeks she was fired from her job for sexually abusing an elderly, female patient, demanded that I quit school one semester shy of completion, and pushed me to work full-time at a local factory to support an oversize apartment we could not afford. She then crawled into bed and only crawled out again to eat the meals I cooked for her after long hours rebuilding automotive parts.

Physician health thyself.

We immediately got into couples counseling. She demanded we quit about the time the counselor got tired and demanded that she start honestly communicating her needs and issues with me. Over the following years we saw two other counselors. They both bottom-lined it for her in the same terms. She refused.

The irony is that her undergrad and practicum was in dealing with battered spouses. But in her world battered spouse was a gender biased term. Only women could be victims of spousal abuse, or at least only someone married to a man. From the time we were engaged, we had a list of unrelenting House Rules. Among them were:
No hitting: (men may not hit women but women are only being expressive with their fists.)
No name calling: (When I was fuzz-ball, Dick, Ass-hole, or worse. that wasn’t name-calling. Women aren’t capable of name-calling.)
No money hiding: (Men hide money so they can leave their wives or cheat, women are only providing a means of escaping abuse when they do the same.)
No castle secrets: (A woman’s privacy is sacred, a man is only using secrecy to do bad things or talking about his feelings with a third party to shame his wife.)
My upbringing had made me constitutionally incapable of hitting a woman. But that hadn’t really been the point of the rule. When I began amending her rules to be gender neutral that was considered abusive. Also, announcing that she was Klingon (aside from the lecture on Trekker vs Trekkie that should have sent me running) was not a mixed message, even when she was asking me to engage in the mating practices of next-gen Klingons. Something I was not into in the least. It made me sick.

After she left, I went just a little bit mad. To provide context four women have stalked me in my life. No stuffed bunnies involved, but ‘C’ still drives by my house then speeds away just to see if I’m around. ‘B’ contacted my mother, two years after we lost contact, while I was in residential college, and tricked Mom into giving her my contact information so she could make menacing calls. ‘S’ looked me up when my wife left and kept showing up wherever I went in the local county. A fourth left a poem in my locked car in college:
Roses are red
Andorans are blue
Always remember
Someone’s watching you.
My wife confessed that one was her. We were engaged at the time.

In the counsel of many, there is dissonance.

Old friends and peers, church family, even strangers began to have very definite opinions about my marriage and character and feeling the need to share them. I couldn’t even go to Starbucks for a coffee and a chance to write, without a stranger walking up and engaging me in a conversation about marriage and how women can never leave a man unless he’s abusive.

It made me reclusive, something at odds with my natural disposition. A college friend refused a facebook friend-request with the message: I prefer to remember you as the friend I knew in college, and blocked me. The worst of it was no one who knew the both of us would share what her real motives might have been or why she chose to disappear from my life rather than leave a line of communication for the future. I grieved long and hard and the wounds kept reopening because of the third party abuse.

Knowledge is Freedom

When my friend sent me the link to my wife’s article, I took a moment to brace myself then read it with trepidation. It was shocking, in a very objective and physical way. Psychogenesis is not a game for children. But, on the heels of the lightheadedness was an overpowering sense of joy, peace, and freedom.

As I read, I realized the real cause of the divorce and finally got the closure I needed. I saw just how deeply ill and delusional my wife has been and I began to realize how the narrative she’d been perpetuating kept her trapped and unable to break the walls of grief and rage she’d built for herself.

It would be pointless to play the he vs she game at this point. In spite of the delusional nature of her recall, which has moved events around and even changed the year of her miscarriage and forgets the DNC she had before we were married (I was not the father of that one)–my wife believes the narrative. She remembers these fictitious or even dream events and the trauma to her is just as real as if they had actually happened. I grieve for her. I don’t however have any responsibility for those events, and it is freeing to know that the majority of those things she suffers over are not my doing.

I have to admit in retrospect there were strong indicators. More than once, she woke up from a dream convinced that the events in her dreams were real, I should know what they were, and I should be duly repentant for what I’d done in her dreams. IT was not her resonsibility to tell me what she had dreamed. Bear in mind that she was fully aware and admitted that they were dreams. But this was a castle secret.

My life and hers could have been much happier if at some point she’d been willing to admit what things she believed I’d done and what had happened. It would have helped me if I’d been able to overcome the machismo that made it shameful to admit I was a battered, emotionally abused, verbally abused, financially abused, and erstwhile grieving father. But I was the man so I had to be the strong one, the stoic, the invincible, the punching bag.

The bottom line is communication is critical, and privacy is a basic human need–but secrecy is toxic to every form of human interaction. In secrecy, sickness and insanity go without care. In secrecy, abuse, both real and imagined, goes unhealed. In secrecy, hope dies. In secrecy, delusion is omnipotent. But secrecy is at times the only defense against cultural bias and misandry.

The mediation will be socialized.

This is the point where most blogs would give a short, saccarine offer of hope and a hotline. I have yet to find a hotline that really deals with men abused by women except to blame the victim.

If you are an abused man, know there is hope. I have no respect for modern psychology or it’s religious technology alternatives. In place of a hotline, I recommend you get away, get safe, and get a Bible. When you have the perspective, find a friend that believes you, that you can trust, someone patient who doesn’t practice tough love. And get busy with low stress work and helping others.

Remember, when someone hurts you, it’s probably not about you.

Famous Spoofs and Other Lost Freedoms

The broader issue of the recent sexual abuse/harassment revelations is the depravity of the media based celebrity machine. Louie CK would never have been in a position to behave the way he did if not for the perceived authority attached to fame and media success. This is the biggest lie of the cult of celebrity. Entertainers, while a lot more fun than your average motorcycle mechanic or fast food delivery driver, are actually less important. This goes for the producers, editors, writers (Ugh! They got me, Joe) and technicians in movies and television as well. Actors like Spacey, producers like Weinstein, they are instrumental in providing a product you may like or pass on. But they aren’t important. Their failures, however criminal, don’t matter directly to you and yours, unless you are a victim or concerned with the very real problem of predatory sexuality. We all should be. And we all should do our part to change the social environment so that the victim is free and even comfortable telling.

The problem is the Baby Boomers have gotten increasingly paranoid and they’ve shared that paranoia with the Millennials. Every new violent crime, immediately brings out the [x] Broadcasting Company, or the [y] News Network to open the big top and pedantically call the play by play like some OCD sportscaster. “Okay, let’s go to Jimmy Joe who’s watching from the police barricade. Tell me Jimmy is the suspect wearing paisley with stripes? That looks like stripes. Did you know that Paisleys are made int the shape of the perimeter of the Himalayas?–”

This is followed by an endless cry for tighter laws governing every spoken word, meal item, clothing choice, etc. of the private citizen. Every move is strategically placed to further limit individuality, choice and privacy guaranteed by the US Constitution. From Louie CK to Civil Liberty? Really? Well, yeah. If louie had done the same thing in a protest against organized religion, guns, Donald Trump–staged on the White House lawn–the same people crying “foul unclean, go thee to perdition” would be celebrating his brave act of conscience in pursuit of PC values. The media would not be concerned with the collateral damage to young impressionable minds of children or young women. Why? Because as a celebrity, he would be perceived as having some authority on issues social and political.

This is the heart of it. If Weinstein were just an employer, a choice among many, women would have felt free to avoid his casting couch–and report to man for sexual harassment or rape. But as celebrities they had to protect public opinion about their private life. A Rumor of misconduct by those women, would have lead to an end of career. “A few phone calls,” and they’d “never work in Hollywood again.”

Why should an actors private sexuality, criminal misconduct, political opinions, religious affiliations, etc. matter one whit. They really aren’t stars. They are artists and craftspeople. They make a product you like buying. Nothing more. But nothing less. If a factory worker can’t get a job because he spent time in prison as a young adult, we say poor man. It becomes and Hallmark movie about human triumph, and we get Spacey to play the poor unfortunate. If a young girl struggling with too much celebrity and a total lack of privacy, shoplifts to self-medicate we crucify her and relegate her to years without work, until we forget and move on to the next victim.

The star system is nothing more than a particularly successful marketing scheme. It’s like fast food games and giveaway, BOGO, get your free gift with purchase, over a billion served. If it’s kept in propotion it serves its purpose. But when it creates a standard for vetting employees it is a problem. When that trend spreads and corporations begin vetting employees based on their social media, background checks, and an invasion of privacy worse than Big Brother, it is a threat to peace and security and needs to be put on hiatus.

When a young man has to wait 15 years to report a sexual assault by a drunken coworker, because he will be seen as a troublemaker and his career ended, due to his attackers Star status on broadway– When a writer finds it difficult to be published, not because of his skill with the elements of story and plot, but because he falls in the wrong canine classification– When a rising actress and comedienne can’t complain about a drunken lout masturbating in front of her because he thinks her discomfort is comedic–It’s not time for stars to fall, its time to take down the black velvet curtain.

A Dictionary Word to the Wise

“The contest, for ages, has been to rescue Liberty from the grasp of executive power.”
~Daniel Webster, Speech in the Senate, May 27, 1834

They problem in Websters day was the over bloated presidency and the thoroughly dominated Congress. It took it’s greatest expression in the dictatorships of the early republican presidents and a few significant democrats at the time. The last 25 years have been a resurgence of that dictatorship. Today however it is a union of all three branches in the interest of curtailing individual human rights. I will not use the word liberty, which implies that these freedoms are a grant of largess by an altruistic state. These are rights given by God and only kept available by hawkish curtailment of abuse by all three branches of government.

Dodging the Coffee Clutch

Yesterday, I was at The Coffee Place, or the coffee place, depending on my mood. I laid my burdens on the big black, enameled table and ordered a cafe’ au lait, with my usual swagger. The coffee came, I took my seat, and unpacked my little mobile office. I ride a gas powered scooter (Chinese made 150cc gy-7 with 16″ rims), so I’ve learned to travel with a courier’s bag and a computer case smaller than most purses. But, out of these, I can soon fill a large desk with pages of manuscript and electronics.

Sadly, I had covered the large table and, realizing I was being bad neighborly, I asked the woman at the next table if I might have the empty chair next to her, to pile on some of my stuff and clear room for others to share. She had her purse perched in the chair, in just the same way, but, after an awkward negotiation where I declined the chair and she pushed, I finally stacked my courier bag and helmet in the chair, and cleared the table, except for my netbook and my computer case (the little one).

Thus situated, I decided to check my Skype, before getting down to work. A friend had shared this story, about a four-year-old, Mini, and her precocious imagination, and the embarrassment it caused her mother. The story was funny, and touching, and a quirky commentary on the paranoid, judgmental culture, that is America today (or when Mini was four). When we got to the part where Mini was explaining proper water-ride etiquette to her exhausted mother, I burst out in laughter.

It was spontaneous, but the septuagenarian at the table next to me jumped nearly out of her seat. Apparently, she’d been watching me and paying an inordinate amount of attention to what I was doing. Rather a funny coincidence, given the story I was reading.

Since I’d disturbed her, asking for the chair and again with my laugh, I decided to give a short, very short, explanation of the conversation tween Mini and her mom. I was quite terse, but hit the high points regarding infectious water and water ride etiquette, (you really should read it). That done, I said, “Well, I best get back to my writing.”

Okay, technically, I was reading. But I was nearly finished with the entry, and about to move on to writing. I had a short story to finish–about a mysterious traveler forced by local bandits and an ignorant police inspector to investigate a murder he is illegally charged with. With the aid of an array of anachronistic inventions–you get the picture. But now I was stuck in one of those conversations.

Ah, yes. Those conversations. They are a pitfall of the coffee house. The large number of aging boomers and homeless who congregate as the coffee house have a tendency toward garrulousness that approaches the level of social disorder. They are a real impediment at times. It’s very hard to write bout faeries and steam powered interstellar craft, when the guy next to you won’t stop regaling you with the details of his motion for conservatorship over his father, or her forbidden love with a Mexican celebrity who she must watch from afar using Google Satellite images of his villa in Yucatan.

In this case, it was the movie she’d seen with her son. How disgusting! It was one of those juvenile romps where an adult who should know better, goes out and acts like a teen-ager on break in Cancun in the eighties. Of course there was the obligatory, unwanted insinuation we should go see a movie together. I listened politely, making concerned noises and even sharing a quick anecdote from my own life, to show my basal concern for her as a person, before excusing myself and getting back to writing. Remember that? It’s the reason I’m even at The Coffee Place.

That’s when things took a decidedly distasteful turn. In the course of the movie discussions, Siskel and Ebert came up. Of course, she felt the need to stress the tragedy of Roger Ebert’s disfiguring cancer. I pointed out that Gene Siskel had been a bit of a healthnick, and still died far earlier than Ebert. Rather than allowing me to return to my computer, she continued talking as if I had simply made a bad joke. Now, she began to try and get personal information about me. I tried to be polite, but I did, again, remind her I was there to work. She quizzed me about my computer, tried to drag me into a critique of the ethics of dumping beta tech on an unsuspecting buyer at Fry’s, and used colonoscopy recommendations as a means to try and get me to tell her my age.

Mind you, it never occurred to her to simply ask for the information she wanted, or to have an frank conversation. She was too busy playing at pushing to get anywhere with me, and her lack of subtlety only made it worse. Bearing in mind I’m a heterosexual, I’ve been hit on by both men and women. Not that I’m a George Clooney or Brad Pitt, but it happens. This is the first time, however, I’ve ever encountered:”Have you had a colonoscopy yet, they say every man should have one at fifty,” as a pick-up line. My advice don’t use it.